...
- Test: Extract Mw for all ruptures from SRF.info and plot them versus the Leonard relationship (2011- Table 6).
Pass criterion: if all the data sits on the one-to-one line, the magnitude of SRFs are correct.
Note: Make sure stable continental region (SRC) of is NOT used. Only use DS and SS equations from of Table 6 of Leonard (2011).
Note: SRF.info contains this information (File Formats Used On GM) - Test: Plot number of realizations for a given fault based on its magnitude versus the number of the SRF files exists in the corresponding directory for that given fault.
Pass criterion: if the values sit on the one-to-one line, the number of realizations are correct. - Test: Plot lower seismogenic depth of a given fault from national hazard model (Stirling et al 2012) versus the same value that from SRF.info (i.e. dbottom).
Pass criterion: this should be
...
- There should be two clusters of results on the plot. Some results should be on the one-to-one line (i.e., the ruptures that have seismogenic depth lower than 12km), the other ones should have dbottom values in the SRF.info that are 3 km above the corresponding values from national hazard model.
Note: 12 km and 2 km values are hard-coded in the SRF generation code. - Test: Plot (on a map) one realization of SRFs generated for all the faults considered in the Cybershake runs. If faults are not included in a Cyebrshake run, plot the geometry of it with a different color.
- Pass criterin: A researcher will look at the plot and look for anomalies in terms of fault geometries. Also, the researcher should see the
...
2- Velocity model:
3- Simulation:
...