You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

1- Verification of inputs

Here are the checks that should be conducted before submitting simulation jobs to HPC:

 

Rupture 

  1. Test: Extract Mw for all ruptures from SRF.info and plot them versus the Leonard relationship (2011- Table 6).
    Pass criterion: if all the data sits on the one-to-one line, the magnitude of SRFs are correct.

    Note: Make sure stable continental region (SRC) of is NOT used. Only use DS and SS equations from of Table 6 of  Leonard (2011).
    Note: SRF.info contains this information (File Formats Used On GM)

  2. Test: Plot number of realizations for a given fault based on its magnitude versus the number of the SRF files exists in the corresponding directory for that given fault.
    Pass criterion:  if the values sit on the one-to-one line, the number of realizations are correct.

  3. Test: Plot lower seismogenic depth of a given fault from national hazard model (Stirling et al 2012) versus that from SRF.info (i.e. dbottom).
    Pass criterion: There should be two clusters of results on the plot. Some results should be on the one-to-one line (i.e., the ruptures that have seismogenic depth lower than 12km), the other ones should have dbottom values in the SRF.info that are 3 km above the corresponding values from national hazard model.

    Note: 12 km and 2 km values are hard-coded in the SRF generation code.

  4. Test: Plot (on a map) one realization of SRFs generated for all the faults considered in the Cybershake runs. If faults are not included in a Cyebrshake run, plot the geometry of it with a different color.
  5. Pass criterin: A researcher will look at the plot and look for anomalies in terms of fault geometries. Also, the researcher should see the 

 

 

 

2- Velocity model:

 

 

3- Simulation:

 

 

4- 

2- Outputs from simulation 

Here are the checks on the obtained results from simulations:

1- 


 

 

  • No labels