In order to validate the binary workflow we have followed two steps:
- Verify that HF produced with the text workflow is exactly the same as the one produced by the binary workflow at the waveform level
- They use the same Fortran code so the waveforms should match
- BB verification also occurs on the waveforms. There are two stages, as some code has been ported to Python from C:
- Without site amplification ie. we use vs = 500 for everything.
- Include the site amplification and verify once again.
Results
HF
For random locations, the HF accelerations are visually close. Also, when computing the RMS error, we get less than 0.01% of discrepancy. For example:
Location WAI:
For this location we have the RMS per component of:
Component | RMS |
---|---|
000 | 0.0063 |
090 | 0.0108 |
ver | 0.0016 |
BB