You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

eisFinder/Hazard Calculation

Background

Notes

 

Story / Deliverable

When calculating deagg with IM type, location and cs_ver, varying IM_level or exceedance should not force the program to re-read raw IM agg data and process them.

When calculating GM selection, the CLI interface should be the same as deagg calculation, and the same set of parameters should be used.

Tasks/Progress

   WhoStatusDeliverables
(1)Precompute SQLite db for each of 20k stations1 dayViktor  
(2)

Develop an API that outputs all IMs in a numpy array for given IM type, station name

1 dayViktor  
(3)Update setup process to do step (1) automatically.1 daySung  
(4)Fix hazard to use the API from (2)1 daySung  
(5)Fix deagg to use the API from (2)1 daySung  
(6)Write site_search_gm_sel.py that mimics the interface of site_search_deagg.py1 dayViktor  

 

Known Issues / To Dos

  1. Fault screening based on user specified loc vs. simulation domain is no longer necessary as the API from (2) does all the filtering already.

 

 

  • No labels