...
- Karim's 10 locations: Produce hazard/deagg and keep the output data as baseline (may not be scientifically correct)
- Viktor/Claudio to refactor the code to be more suitable for unit testing.
- Develop unit testing
- After refactoring, compare the output with the baseline (to prove no degradation during refactoring)
- Karim to verify the output
- Automate the verification process and implement as a regression test.
What to verify
- For a given im level,
(Totalemp - Type_Aemp)/ Totalcyber (= Type_Acyber + Type_Bemp +DS) , the contribution of DS + Type_Bemp = DS (Type_Bemp is typically very low). Compare this with PointEqkSource at Top Contributing Faults tab.
Feature List
Status | Note | |
---|---|---|
Website | ||
Domain hosted (https) | O | |
Static pages | Place holder pages are in place | |
User login | O | |
User activity DB | eg. Allow the same queries for free | |
Event search | ||
Dataset | All Cybershake v18p6 | |
single site | O | |
multiple site | O | |
custom name | O | |
Intensity measures (all?) | O | |
Download IMs for all sites | O | |
Download Acc. time series for all sites | O | |
Site search | ||
Data set | All Cybershake v18p6 | |
Intensity measures (all?) | O | |
NZ code spectra | Default values for Z factor, minimum distance, soil class to be developed. | |
Disaggregation Exceedance | 50%, 10% 2% | |
Disaggregation result | O | |
by Type | O | |
by Epsilon | O | |
by Top contributing faults | O | |
Ground Motion Selection | ||
Underlying code | ||
Link with web interface |
...