Locations of sources and stations in a 2D grid. The depths of sources are not mentioned.

The 3D geological velocity model of Canterbury region

Geometrical correlation among 312 seismogram channels for 4 sources and 78 stations. This value can be used as weight function for measuring the redundancy of data usage.


Ray density map absed on the geometrical correlation for 4 sources and 78 stations in Canterbury region

The true,  initial and inverted models involved in the inversion process using 4 given sources and 78 stations. The adjoint-wavefield method uses reversed-in-time displacement residual as adjoint source.

True model

Initial model

Inverted model after an iteration

Inverted model after 3 iterations

Misfit function and step length:

Waveform comparison between observed and simulated seismograms after one iteration for source 4 (event 3550173m4pt7) at station DFHS

Inversion starting with a smooth model from true model using 4 given sources and 78 stations.

True model

Smooth initial model

Inverted model after 2 iterations

Misfit function and step length:

Cross-session comparison at z=2km

True model

Smooth initial model

Inverted model


  • No labels