...

2- Verifications of scientific outputs:

The minimal list of IMs considered here: PGA, PGV, SA(0.5, 1.0,3.0,5.0), Ds595, Ds575, CAV, AI

a) Automated verification:

1. As part of the simulation automated workflow, calculate the ratio of simulation over empirical for the first realization of each given fault (once the simulation is finished), then compare the mean bias for the data including all stations with a user_specified_threshold. If the mean bias is smaller than a threshold, keep continuing with the rest of realizations for that fault, otherwise, stop the queue for that fault and inform the analyst.

b) Manual verification:

1. Intensity measures on a map view: plot

   IM (e.g., PGA, PGV, SA(0.5, 1.0,3.0,5.0), Ds595, Ds575, CAV, AI)

   IMs on the map view

   - Simulation IM 

   - Empirical IM 

   - The ratio of Simulation / Empirical 

   - IM plot versus Rrup overlayed with the corresponding empirical