Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

VersionNum sourcesSRF generationVM domainVM generationSimulation specsEstimated core-hoursActual core hoursNotes 
v17.815 (dominant in Canterbury)

3 hypo and 2 slip dist per source

automated based on PGV>5cm/s; 15kmRup, 5km land cutoff

Default depth and duration scaling
0.4km regular grid, Vs_min=500Transition freq = 0.25Hz~3k Fitzroy 

First implementation;

Focus on running workflow and comparison with empirically-derived hazard curves 

v17.9 + v18p4 (87 faults)~ (South Island)

hypo every 20 km along strike,

3 slip dist per source

Same as v17.8as for v17.8as for v17.8-- hours on Kupe Focus on extending number of sources and srf uncertianties 

v18.5

all North Island faultsSame as v17.9as for v17.9as for v17.9as for v17.9-- hours on Kupe

 


 

Running for the North Island sources to merge with 18p4 (and 17p9) to have a nation-wide hazard results

v18p6

 

483 sources across NZ

Magnitude-dependant number of realizations

one slip distribution per hypocentre

Pgv threshold of 2 cm/s

as for v17.9

as for v17.9150 k on Kupe 
  • Monte Carlo hypocentre realizations
  • Variation in hypocentre location along the strike and dip directions

v17.11

(planning)

~100 (Canterbury)?? Possibly more hypocentres down-dip

a. Improve depth scaling and duration scaling. Consider time step lengthening within stability limit

0.2km regular grid, Vs_min=500

Transition frequency = 0.5 Hz~500k Fitzroy(?)  Focus on producing NZ-wide output at lower freq transition
v ?? ?       

 

Verification process:

...