...
Note that his page is for internal sharing purposes only, it is likely inaccurate and out-of-date, and therefore it is advised to conduct researchers directly if you want more reliable information
~540 (all in NZ)
| Version | Num sources | SRF generation | VM domain | VM generation | Simulation specs | Estimated core-hours | Actual core hours | Notes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v17.8 | 15 (dominant in Canterbury) | vX.XX rupgenerator 3 hypo and 2 slip dist per source | automated based on PGV>5cm/s; 15kmRup, 5km land cutoff Default depth and duration scaling | 0.4km regular grid, Vs_min=500 | Transition freq = 0.25Hz | ~3k Fitzroy | First implementation; Focus on running workflow and comparison with empirically-derived hazard curves | |||||
| v17.9 (planning) | ~100 (dominant in Canterbury, but most of Sth ~161 (South Island) | hypo every X 20 km along strike, Y 3 slip dist per source | automated for PGV>5cm/s ... Improved depth scaling | Same as v17.8 | as for v17.8 | as for v17.8 | ~30k Fitzroy | Focus on extending number of sources and srf uncertianties | ||||
v17.10 | ~100 (Canterbury) | 540 (NZ-wide; just extend v17.9 to more sources) | Same as v17.9? | as for v17.9 | 0.2km regular grid, Vs_min=500 | Transition frequency = 0.5 Hz | ~170k Fitzroy | as for v17.9 | as for v17.9 | ~?? Fitzroy | Focus on improved freq transition in South Island | |
v17.11 (planning) | ~540 ~100 (all in NZCanterbury) | ?? | as for v17.9 | as for v17.8 | Possibly more hypocentres down-dip | a. Improve depth scaling and duration scaling. Consider time step | 0.2km regular grid, Vs_min=500 | Transition frequency = 0.5 Hzas for v17.8 | ~500k Fitzroy(?) | Focus on producing NZ-wide output at lower freq transition | ||
| v ?? | ? |
Verification process:
Fault rupture (SRF) files:
...