2016 Funded Projects

Does not include travel funding or workshops


Project IDResearchersProject TitleArea
16002Somerville, Bradley, Bayless, Hosseini & SkarlatoudisValidation of Strong Ground Motion Simulations of two Historical New Zealand Subduction Zone Earthquakes on the SCEC Broadband Strong Ground Motion Simulation PlatformFP1
16005Orchiston, Smith, McDonald, Brown, Harvey, Simmons, Blanchfield & WornerScoping Tourism Dynamics Post-Quake: A Module for MERITFP5
16006Stirling & Van HoutteValidation of earthquake simulations using fragile geologic features.FP1
16008Becker, Egbelakin, Johnston, Orchiston & InghamWhere perceptions and policy meet: Understanding pathways to improving mitigation for earthquake prone buildingsFP3
16009Johnston, Ardagh, Ingham, Deely & MacDonaldHuman Behaviour in Earthquakes: Implications for Engineering DesignSEED
16010KeeneyDevelopment of a Vision Mātauranga Strategy that addresses the particular research needs of QuakeCoRE SEED
16011Glavovic & WhiteUnderstanding the governance dimensions of earthquake resilienceFP5
16012Filippova, Grimes & InghamQuantifying the economic impact of New Zealand’s earthquake-prone building policy on commercial property marketsFP3
16013Cubrinovski, Stringer & van BallegooyEffects of Partial Saturation on Liquefaction TriggeringFP2
16014Brower & JohnstonThe evolution of New Zealand earthquake safety policyFP3
16015Palermo, Cowan, White, Reynolds & YenDesign Procedure and Feasibility Analysis of Low-Damage Dissipative Rocking Precast Concrete Bridge DecksFP4
16016Chang-Richards, Brown & SmithEffects of alternative reconstruction pathways on earthquake recoveryFP5
16020Hogan, Henry,Jason Ingham, Wilson & HashemiCollaborative framework for large‐scale structural testing between New Zealand research institutions and Swinburne University of TechnologyTP1
16023Morris, Carradine, Li, Bird, Parker, Thomas, Beattie, Chang-Richards & LaCrosseImproving seismic performance, resilience, repair and assessment of New Zealand light frame houses with a focus on post-event occupation.FP4
16024Motter, Elwood, Pampanin & Weng Yuen KamLoading Protocols and Limit State Criteria for Laboratory TestingTP1
16025Orense, Pender, Wotherspoon, van Ballegooy & CubrinovskiEvaluation of liquefaction potential of pumiceous deposits through field testingFP2
16026Pender, Orense & van BallegooyNumerical modelling of recorded pore pressure response during the Canterbury Earthquake SequenceFP2
16027Wotherspoon, Bradley, Reid, Hargreaves & WopereisDynamic Site Characterisation of the Nelson/Tasman RegionFP1
16029Hatton, Brown, Seville & BlacklockCreating the business case for investment in organisational resilienceFP5
16030Bradley, Lee, Thomson, Jeong, Razafindrakoto, Wotherspoon, Fraser, Massey, Quigley, Asimaki, Baker, Rodriguez-Marek & GravesAdvancing ground motion simulation methodologies through further insights from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakesFP1
16034McGann, Bradley, Wotherspoon, Clare & SunOpenSees on NeSI computational resources: Implementation of source code, pre- and post-processing software development, and community workshopsTP4
16035Pettinga, Fraser & BradleyGuidance for the utilization of earthquake-induced ground motion simulations in engineering practiceFP1
16037Vargo, Walker, Stevenson & HattonData integration and visualisation: Prototyping QuakeCoRE data platform for diverse needs.TP3
16038Giovinazzi, Seville, Baker, Elwood & StannardLinking building properties and damage to earthquake-induced business’ downtimeFP5
16043Lacrosse, Bradley & van BallegooyComparison between deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction triggering assessment approaches over the Christchurch areaFP2
16046Elwood, Henry, Motter, Hube & SmithResidual capacity of repaired reinforced concrete walls and lower-damage modificationsFP4
16050Massey, Carey, Villeneuve & FentonWhy did the “toe slumps” slump during the 2010/11 Canterbury earthquakes?SEED
16051Saunders, Mathieson, Coomer & RiesAre plans at fault? Understanding how active faults are incorporated into land use plansFP5
16054Horspool, Cody, Elwood, Uma & NayerlooSmart Seismic Cities TP3
16056 van Ballegooy, Cubrinovski, Russell & BastinLateral Spreading Observations and Interpretation from the Christchurch EarthquakesFP2
16058Dizhur,Ingham, Bradley & CattanachShake table testing of simple and practical securing solutions for face loaded unreinforced masonry wallsFP3
16059Wilson, Dohaney, Brogt, Hudson-Doyle, Bradley, Kennedy & JohnstonKnowledge transfer for sustainable earthquake risk communication practice: Advancing student and professionals skills in risk communicationEOT
16060van Ballegooy, Bastin, Orense, Pender & WotherspoonWhakatane liquefaction case history from the 1987 Edgecumbe Earthquake: examination of an extensive CPT dataset supplemented by paleo-liquefaction investigationsFP2
16061Chiaro, Taylor, Wotherspoon & PalmerCharacterisation of cyclic behaviour and liquefaction resistance of Wellington Port gravelly soilsFP2
16066Sarti & Smith, Palermo, Pampanin, Granello, Ponzo & DrummondUnderstand the dynamic characteristics of post-tensioned multi-storey timber buildings through monitoring and field testing on actual implementationsFP4
16067Rodgers, Pampanin, Ma & ChaseDirection Dependent Dissipation (D3) Devices: Semi-Active Behaviour with the robustness of a passive deviceFP4
16073Clifton & LimEnhanced Seismic Resilience of Light Steel Frame Pallet Racking SystemsFP4
16074Ingham,Dizhur, Noy & JohnstonExemplar retrofits: Celebrating successFP3
16075Ivory, Bowie, Ingham, Davies & StevensStronger buildings via precinct upgrades: Understanding lesson learnt from past precinct approachesFP3
16076Jafarzadeh, Ingham & McAulayThe cost of seismic retrofits: Case studies from Auckland CouncilFP3
16077Noy, Parker, Filippova, Seville & VargoInsurance for EQP buildings – incentives, premiums, and contractsFP3
16028/68Stringer, Orense, Cubrinovski & PenderEvaluation of undistributed sampling techniques for pumiceous soilsFP2

Please note, this table is correct to the best of our knowledge, and is subject to change. Please contact admin@quakecore.nz if you notice any errors.

  • No labels